Good bone health depends on more than calcium. We explore food, digestion, the ageing microbiome, muscle, menopause and fracture risk—and examine what the evidence really says about popular foods, probiotics and supplements.

When people think about eating for healthy bones, calcium is usually the first nutrient that comes to mind. It is important—but it is only one part of the story. Bone is living tissue. Throughout life, areas of older bone are removed and replaced with newly formed tissue. This continuous renewal helps the skeleton respond to physical demands, repair microscopic damage and maintain its structure. To do this well, the body needs sufficient energy, protein, minerals and vitamins. It also needs movement: the skeleton responds to the forces created by weight-bearing activity and muscle contraction.

This means that a good diet for bone health is not based on a single food, supplement or “superfood”. It is part of a wider maintenance system involving nutrition, muscle strength, hormonal health, balance, physical activity and individual fracture risk.

The evidence in brief

Well established: avoiding nutritional deficiency; obtaining adequate calcium and protein; correcting vitamin D deficiency when present; and combining nutrition with appropriate weight-bearing, resistance and balance exercise.

Supported in particular contexts: correcting low calcium and protein intake in frail older adults; maintaining a varied, nutrient-dense dietary pattern; and protecting muscle as well as bone.

Promising but not yet definitive: soya foods, prunes and particular plant-rich dietary patterns.

Early or emerging research: chia for bone outcomes in humans, and attempts to modify the gut microbiome or its metabolites specifically to prevent osteoporosis.

Bone health begins early—but it remains important throughout life. Most people reach their peak bone mass during their twenties, although the precise timing varies. The amount of bone built during childhood, adolescence and early adulthood provides an important reserve for later life.

After peak bone mass is reached, bone formation no longer consistently exceeds bone breakdown. With increasing age, the balance gradually shifts and bone may be lost more quickly than it is replaced.

We cannot completely prevent the biological changes associated with ageing. However, diet and physical activity continue to matter well beyond the age of 30. They can help reduce avoidable bone loss, preserve the muscles needed for stability and mobility, and address nutritional deficiencies that may otherwise weaken the bone–muscle system.

Why menopause matters

The menopausal transition is a particularly important period for bone health. As oestrogen levels decline, the rate of bone resorption can increase, sometimes producing a period of accelerated bone loss.

This does not mean that osteoporosis is exclusively a women’s condition. Men generally begin adulthood with a higher average bone mass and tend to lose it more gradually, but they also develop osteoporosis and experience fragility fractures as they age.

Osteoporosis often develops without obvious symptoms. For many people, the first sign is a fracture following a fall from standing height or another relatively minor injury. This is why preserving bone strength—and identifying individual risk before a fracture occurs—is so important.

The nutritional architecture of healthy bone

Bone contains a mineral component, principally calcium and phosphate, organised around an organic matrix made largely from type I collagen. Supporting this structure requires more than simply consuming a large amount of calcium. A good bone-supportive diet should provide:

• sufficient calcium;
• adequate protein distributed across the day;
• enough vitamin D to support calcium absorption and normal muscle function;
• an overall varied diet providing the energy and micronutrients required for tissue maintenance;
• regular meals that make adequate intake sustainable rather than relying on occasional large doses.

Calcium: essential, but not the whole answer

Approximately 99% of the body’s calcium is stored in the bones and teeth. Calcium is also required for nerve signalling, muscle contraction and other essential functions. The body therefore regulates the concentration of calcium in the blood very closely.

If too little calcium is absorbed from the diet over a prolonged period, the skeleton may be used as a reservoir to help maintain blood calcium. Persistently inadequate intake can therefore contribute to the loss of bone mineral.

Calcium requirements differ according to age, sex, pregnancy, health status and national guidance. As one example, the US National Institutes of Health recommends 1,000 mg per day for most adults aged 19–50, increasing to 1,200 mg for women over 50 and men over 70. These figures should not be treated as a personalised prescription: someone with osteoporosis, kidney disease, malabsorption or another relevant condition may require individual advice.

Useful food sources of calcium

Milk, yoghurt and cheese are convenient sources of calcium and also provide protein, phosphorus and other nutrients. However, dairy products are not the only option. Calcium can also be obtained from:

• calcium-fortified plant drinks;
• tofu made with calcium salts;
• sardines and canned salmon when the softened bones are eaten;
• kale, broccoli and bok choy;
• almonds, pulses and certain seeds, although the amount per usual serving varies.

Check labels carefully. Not every plant drink is fortified, and the calcium content of tofu depends on the coagulant used during manufacture. Fortified drinks should usually be shaken before serving because added calcium can settle at the bottom of the container.

The amount in the food is not the amount absorbed

Calcium bioavailability varies. Spinach, for example, contains calcium but also contains oxalates that bind it and substantially reduce absorption. The proportion absorbed from kale, broccoli and bok choy is higher, although a normal portion may contain less total calcium than a serving of dairy food.

The practical lesson is not to exclude spinach—it remains a nutritious vegetable—but to avoid assuming that every calcium-containing food contributes the same amount of absorbable calcium.

Protein connects bone health with muscle health

Protein is sometimes overlooked in conversations about osteoporosis. Yet bone is not made from mineral alone: protein is needed to form its collagen-rich organic framework.

Protein is also essential for preserving muscle. This matters because bone strength is only one part of fracture prevention. Muscle weakness, poor balance and reduced mobility can make a fall more likely, while stronger muscles help stabilise the body and transmit useful mechanical forces to bone.

Protein can come from fish, eggs, dairy foods, meat, pulses, soya foods, nuts and seeds. Some foods conveniently provide more than one bone-relevant nutrient:

• sardines with their edible bones provide protein and calcium;
• oily fish provides protein and some vitamin D;
• calcium-set tofu provides plant protein and calcium;
• yoghurt provides protein and calcium in an easily incorporated food.

The aim is not to adopt an extreme high-protein diet. It is to avoid inadequate intake and to include a suitable source of protein regularly. People with kidney disease or particular metabolic conditions should seek individual advice before substantially changing their protein intake.

A prospective study of 2,160 community-dwelling adults with a mean age of approximately 73 found that those obtaining at least 15% of their energy from protein had higher bone mineral density at several sites than those in the lowest intake group. Higher intake was also associated with fewer clinical vertebral fractures during five years of follow-up. However, protein intake did not predict the rate of change in bone density, the total number of fractures was small, and the observational design cannot prove causation.

This illustrates an important principle: protein is part of the bone-maintenance environment, but it should not be presented as an isolated osteoporosis treatment. Its value is most plausibly understood alongside adequate calcium, total energy, muscle-preserving activity and the person’s overall health.

The whole dietary pattern matters

Research is increasingly moving beyond single nutrients to ask whether the overall pattern and quality of the diet influence skeletal ageing.

A Mediterranean-style pattern

In a 2025 secondary analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus randomised trial, 924 adults aged 55–75 with overweight or obesity and metabolic syndrome were followed for three years. An energy-reduced Mediterranean diet combined with physical-activity support produced some favourable effects on bone mineral density, particularly at the lumbar spine in women, compared with advice to follow a Mediterranean diet without the intensive weight-loss and activity programme.

The finding is interesting, but it cannot be attributed to diet alone because the intervention combined dietary change, energy restriction and physical activity. The participants also represented a specific cardiometabolic-risk population, and the study examined bone density rather than fractures.

The practical value of a Mediterranean-style pattern is therefore not that it has been proven to treat osteoporosis. It is that it can bring several supportive elements together: vegetables, fruit, pulses, nuts, whole grains, olive oil, fish and other protein sources within a varied, minimally processed diet.

“Plant based” is not enough information

A 2024 analysis from the Nurses’ Health Study followed more than 70,000 postmenopausal women. Long-term adherence to a plant-based dietary score was not associated with hip-fracture risk overall. In analyses of more recent intake, however, a plant-rich pattern based on whole grains, fruit, vegetables, nuts and pulses was associated with a lower risk, while a pattern dominated by refined grains, sweetened drinks and desserts was associated with a higher risk.

The authors appropriately cautioned that these recent-diet findings could reflect reverse causation or short-term changes and require confirmation. Nevertheless, the study makes an important conceptual point: a diet does not become protective simply because it contains fewer animal foods. Adequate protein, calcium, vitamin D, energy and overall food quality still need attention.

Vitamin D: important, but supplementation is not automatically protective

Vitamin D supports calcium absorption from the intestine and contributes to normal muscle function. A marked deficiency can impair bone mineralisation and may contribute to muscle weakness, potentially increasing the risk of falling.

There are relatively few natural food sources. Oily fish—including salmon, herring and mackerel—provides vitamin D, as do egg yolks, liver and some mushrooms. Fortified foods may also make an important contribution, depending on the country and product.

However, it is important to distinguish between obtaining enough vitamin D and assuming that taking additional vitamin D will prevent fractures in everyone.

In the large VITAL trial, 25,871 generally healthy middle-aged and older adults received either 2,000 IU of vitamin D daily or placebo. Over a median follow-up of more than five years, supplementation did not reduce total, non-vertebral or hip fractures.

This finding does not mean that vitamin D is unnecessary. The study was not designed specifically for people with vitamin D deficiency, osteoporosis or very low bone density. It tells us that routine additional vitamin D does not guarantee fracture protection in a generally healthy population that was not selected for deficiency.

Does increasing dairy intake prevent fractures?

A notable cluster-randomised trial studied 7,195 older adults living in Australian residential-care facilities. The intervention increased the provision of milk, yoghurt and cheese, raising both calcium and protein intake.

Over two years, residents in the intervention facilities experienced fewer hip fractures, fewer fractures overall and fewer falls than those in the control facilities.

This was an important result, but context matters. The participants were predominantly very old and had relatively low calcium and protein intakes at the beginning of the study. The intervention corrected a nutritional shortfall in a vulnerable population. It does not prove that simply adding more dairy to an already adequate diet will prevent fractures in every person.

The more defensible conclusion is that meeting calcium and protein needs matters—and that correcting inadequate intake can be clinically meaningful in the right population.

Soya foods: nutritious, with promising but incomplete evidence

Soya foods provide high-quality plant protein. Tofu prepared with calcium salts can also be a useful calcium source. Soya additionally contains isoflavones, plant compounds that can interact with oestrogen receptors, although their biological effects are not identical to those of human oestrogen.

Research into soya and postmenopausal bone health has produced mixed findings. A systematic review of observational cohort studies found a possible association between greater soya-food consumption and a lower fracture risk among Asian women, particularly during the earlier years following menopause. The same statistically significant relationship was not identified in men, and evidence from other populations was limited.

This is an interesting signal, not proof that soya prevents or treats osteoporosis. Dietary patterns, genetics, lifelong soya consumption and other lifestyle factors may all influence the observed association.

Soya foods can be included as a nutritious part of a varied diet. However, ordinary foods such as tofu, tempeh and soya milk should not be treated as equivalent to concentrated isoflavone supplements.

Prunes: an interesting result that should not be overstated

Prunes have attracted attention because they contain fibre, minerals and a variety of polyphenolic plant compounds.

In a 12-month randomised trial involving 235 postmenopausal women, eating 50 g of prunes each day helped preserve total hip bone mineral density. In the control group, total hip bone mineral density declined by approximately 1.1%.

This is encouraging, but the distinction between bone density and fracture prevention is important. The trial was not designed to show that prunes prevent fractures. It also does not establish that they can replace adequate calcium, protein, exercise or osteoporosis medication when treatment is indicated.

Prunes may therefore be viewed as a potentially useful food within an overall bone-supportive diet—not as a stand-alone intervention.

People who are increasing their intake should also remember that 50 g is a meaningful daily portion and may affect bowel function or blood glucose responses differently from person to person.

Chia seeds: nutritious food, limited human bone evidence

Chia seeds contain calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, fibre and alpha-linolenic acid, a plant-derived omega-3 fatty acid. These characteristics make them a nutritious addition to many diets.

However, a frequently cited study reporting improved measures of bone mineral content after long-term chia consumption was conducted in male laboratory rats—not humans.

Animal studies can help generate hypotheses, but their findings cannot be assumed to apply directly to postmenopausal women, older adults or people with osteoporosis. At present, chia can be recommended as a nutrient-containing food, but not as a clinically demonstrated method of preventing bone loss or fractures.

What about magnesium and vitamin K?

Calcium does not work in isolation. Magnesium contributes to bone structure and participates in many enzyme systems relevant to vitamin D and mineral metabolism. Vitamin K is required for the activation of osteocalcin and other proteins involved in bone biology.

Foods supplying these nutrients—including leafy vegetables, pulses, nuts, seeds and whole grains—belong naturally within a varied bone-supportive diet. This does not mean that magnesium or vitamin K supplements have been shown to prevent fractures in the general population.

In one prospective cohort, higher magnesium intake was associated with fewer self-reported fractures over eight years. However, this was an observational study in a population recruited for an osteoarthritis initiative, and it cannot establish that magnesium itself caused the difference.

Vitamin K research is similarly mixed. Observational studies have reported associations between dietary vitamin K and fracture risk, but clinical trials of vitamin K supplementation have not produced uniformly convincing improvements in bone density or fracture prevention. Vitamin K supplements can also be inappropriate for people taking warfarin or another vitamin-K-antagonist anticoagulant unless managed by their clinical team.

For both nutrients, the most defensible public-health message is to obtain them through a varied diet rather than assuming that a concentrated supplement will provide additional skeletal protection.

Ageing, digestion and the gut microbiome

Food can only support the skeleton if its nutrients can be digested, absorbed and used. This makes gastrointestinal health an important—although sometimes overlooked—part of an individual bone-health assessment.

The microbiome changes with age

The intestinal microbiome is not fixed. It is influenced by lifelong diet, medicines, illness, infections, physical activity, living environment and ageing itself. Studies of older adults have found greater person-to-person variation than in younger populations. Frailty, restricted diets and residence in long-term care have also been associated with lower microbial diversity and the loss of microbial features commonly observed in healthier community-dwelling adults.

This does not mean that every older person develops the same “unhealthy microbiome”. There is no single list of ideal bacterial strains that applies to everyone. The changes associated with age are highly individual and may partly reflect changes in diet, health, medicines and environment rather than chronological age alone.

How might the gut communicate with bone?

Researchers are investigating a possible diet–microbiome–bone axis. Fibre is fermented by intestinal microorganisms into metabolites including short-chain fatty acids. In laboratory and animal models, some of these metabolites influence intestinal-barrier function, immune signalling, osteoclast development and bone resorption. Microbial activity may also affect the chemical environment in the intestine and therefore the availability of certain minerals.

A 2026 longitudinal analysis followed 223 Swedish women during early postmenopause for two years. Higher fibre intake was associated with a more favourable measure of trabecular bone structure, while several circulating short-chain fatty acids were associated with bone-density or microarchitectural measures.

This is intriguing human evidence, but it remains observational and exploratory. Circulating metabolites are not a simple measurement of intestinal microbial activity, and the direction of cause and effect remains unresolved. The study does not prove that a probiotic, prebiotic or short-chain-fatty-acid supplement can prevent osteoporosis.

What do probiotic trials tell us?

The effects of probiotics are strain-specific. Evidence about one precisely identified microorganism cannot be transferred automatically to another Lactobacillus, to a generic multi-strain product or to fermented food in general.

In a small double-blind trial, 90 women aged 75–80 with low bone mineral density received either Limosilactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 or placebo for one year; 70 completed the study. Loss of total volumetric bone mineral density at the tibia was smaller in the probiotic group. However, significant differences were not demonstrated for the principal secondary measurements at the hip and spine, the study did not assess fracture prevention, and the underlying mechanism remained unclear.

This is useful proof-of-concept evidence—not a basis for recommending that all older women take a probiotic for their bones. Larger independent trials must establish which strains, doses and populations might benefit, whether effects persist, and whether any intervention actually reduces fractures.

Digestion and absorption deserve individual assessment

Calcium is absorbed across the intestinal lining, and vitamin D is required for an important active component of that process. Net calcium absorption declines with age. Low vitamin D status, reduced stomach acid, gastrointestinal disease and some medicines can reduce the amount of a nutrient that becomes available even when intake appears adequate. Examples requiring individual consideration include:

• coeliac disease, inflammatory bowel disease or chronic diarrhoea;
• pancreatic or biliary disease affecting digestion;
• previous bariatric or other gastrointestinal surgery;
• lactose intolerance or highly restricted diets that reduce calcium intake;
• persistent reflux, bloating, abdominal pain or altered bowel habits;
• unexplained weight loss, iron or vitamin B12 deficiency, or recurrent low vitamin D;
• long-term use of medicines that alter gastric acidity, appetite, digestion, nutrient metabolism or bone remodelling.

Reduced stomach acid is particularly relevant to some calcium supplements. Calcium carbonate depends more heavily on gastric acidity and is generally better absorbed with food, whereas calcium citrate is less dependent on stomach acid. This does not mean everyone taking acid-suppressing medication should change supplements; the person’s dietary intake, clinical indication, kidney function, other medicines and total calcium exposure must all be considered.

Supporting the microbiome should therefore begin with the dietary environment where possible: a varied range of vegetables, fruit, pulses, whole grains, nuts and seeds supplies different fermentable fibres and plant compounds. Fermented foods may also contribute to dietary variety when tolerated. However, neither fibre nor fermented food corrects coeliac disease, pancreatic insufficiency, significant malabsorption or another untreated gastrointestinal disorder.

From general advice to an individual bone-health plan

The same recommendation will not be appropriate for everyone. Before adding multiple supplements or a probiotic, a balanced plan should ask what is limiting bone maintenance in that particular person.

1. Assess intake

Estimate habitual calcium, protein, vitamin D and total-energy intake. Identify avoidable gaps, but also check for duplication across food, multivitamins and separate supplements.

2. Assess digestion and absorption

Review gastrointestinal symptoms, bowel pattern, previous surgery, food tolerance and conditions that may cause malabsorption. Where clinically indicated, investigate rather than assuming that persistent symptoms are simply part of ageing.

3. Review medicines

Medicines may affect bone through different mechanisms. Some alter nutrient absorption or vitamin D metabolism; others affect hormones, bone formation, bone resorption, appetite, balance or fall risk. Relevant examples can include long-term glucocorticoids, certain antiseizure medicines, aromatase inhibitors, androgen-deprivation therapy, excessive thyroid-hormone replacement and prolonged acid suppression. This does not mean these medicines should be stopped. It means their skeletal effects and the reason for treatment should be reviewed as part of the whole picture.

The timing of calcium also matters because it can interfere with the absorption of levothyroxine, some antibiotics, bisphosphonates and iron. A pharmacist or prescribing clinician can advise on safe separation.

4. Assess the person’s wider risk

Consider menopause timing, previous fragility fractures, family history, body weight, muscle strength, falls, smoking, alcohol, medical conditions and bone-density results where available. Laboratory assessment may be appropriate when deficiency, malabsorption or a secondary cause of bone loss is suspected.

5. Build a proportionate plan

The resulting plan may include dietary change, treatment of an underlying digestive problem, medication review, targeted supplementation, appropriate exercise, fall-risk reduction or medical osteoporosis treatment. The aim is not to add everything. It is to restore what is missing, remove avoidable obstacles and coordinate each part safely.

This systems approach helps prevent two common errors: assuming that an adequate intake guarantees adequate absorption, and attempting to correct a complex bone-health problem with increasingly large doses of calcium or vitamin D.

Calcium and vitamin D supplements: when more is not better

A major 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated 69 randomised trials involving more than 153,000 adults. It concluded that routine calcium, vitamin D or combined supplementation produced little to no clinically meaningful reduction in fractures or falls for most of the adults represented in the evidence.

The interpretation requires care. Most participants were community-dwelling adults at relatively low baseline risk, and the review did not include people receiving osteoporosis medication. Its conclusions should not be applied indiscriminately to patients with diagnosed osteoporosis, previous fragility fractures, confirmed nutrient deficiency or conditions that substantially increase the risk of malabsorption.

Supplements can be appropriate when dietary intake is insufficient, a deficiency has been identified, malabsorption is present or supplementation forms part of a wider osteoporosis-treatment plan. But they should have a clear purpose.

Calcium caution

Calcium supplements can cause constipation and gastrointestinal discomfort. Excessive intake may increase the risk of kidney stones in susceptible people. Calcium can also reduce the absorption of levothyroxine, some antibiotics, bisphosphonates and iron supplements, so the timing of doses may need to be separated.

Vitamin D caution

Excessive vitamin D can cause hypercalcaemia—an abnormally high concentration of calcium in the blood. Possible consequences include nausea, weakness, confusion, excessive thirst and urination, kidney stones, kidney injury and, in severe cases, disturbances of heart rhythm.

Large intermittent doses should not be assumed to be safer or more effective. In one randomised trial, an annual oral dose of 500,000 IU increased falls and fractures among older women.

The useful question is not simply, “Should I take calcium and vitamin D?” It is:

How much am I already obtaining, do I have an identified deficiency or higher-risk condition, and what dose—if any—is appropriate alongside my medicines and treatment plan?

Do not stop prescribed calcium, vitamin D or osteoporosis medication because of general research findings without discussing your circumstances with an appropriately qualified healthcare professional.

What might a bone-supportive day of eating look like?

There is no single ideal menu, and dietary needs vary. The aim is to distribute calcium and protein sources across the day while maintaining an overall varied diet.

One example might include:

• Breakfast: plain yoghurt or a fortified soya alternative, with fruit, oats and nuts;
• Lunch: a pulse-based soup or salad with calcium-set tofu, leafy vegetables and whole grains;
• Dinner: oily fish, eggs, tofu or another protein source, served with vegetables including broccoli, kale or bok choy;
• Snacks or additions: fruit, a small portion of prunes, nuts, seeds, kefir or another suitable calcium- and protein-containing food.

This is an illustration rather than a prescription. Allergies, digestive tolerance, kidney function, medication, energy needs, cultural preferences and ethical choices all influence what is appropriate.

Diet cannot replace movement

Even a carefully planned diet cannot provide the mechanical stimulus that bone receives from physical loading.

Weight-bearing activities such as walking, stair climbing and dancing can help load the skeleton. Progressive resistance exercise helps preserve muscle and places controlled forces through bone. Balance and functional training may reduce falls by improving stability and confidence in movement.

People with established osteoporosis, previous vertebral fractures, significant pain or a high risk of falling should seek an individually appropriate exercise programme. Certain loaded spinal movements or poorly controlled exercises may be unsuitable, depending on fracture history and physical capacity.

When should you discuss bone assessment?

Osteoporosis may remain silent until a fracture occurs. Consider speaking with a healthcare professional about bone health and fracture-risk assessment if you have:

• experienced a fracture after a minor fall or relatively low level of trauma;
• used glucocorticoid medication for a prolonged period;
• undergone early menopause;
• very low body weight or significant unintentional weight loss;
• a parent who experienced a hip fracture;
• lost more than approximately 4 cm of adult height;
• developed increasing stooping or persistent unexplained back pain;
• a medical condition or medicine known to affect bone metabolism.

Loss of height or increasing curvature of the spine can sometimes reflect vertebral compression fractures, which do not always cause severe pain.

The Wildberry perspective: feed, load, protect and assess

The most useful approach to bone health is not to search for one perfect food. It is to support the entire system that maintains skeletal strength and protects the person from fracture.

Feed the bone: provide sufficient calcium, protein, vitamin D and an overall nutrient-rich diet.

Load the bone: use appropriate weight-bearing and resistance exercise to provide a mechanical signal.

Protect the person: preserve muscle, balance and mobility, and address factors that increase the risk of falling.

Assess individual risk: recognise that menopause, age, previous fractures, medicines, medical conditions and family history can change what prevention or treatment is needed.

Calcium matters. But strong bones are not created—or maintained—by calcium alone. They depend on the continuing coordination of nutrition, muscle, movement, hormones and timely clinical care.

Important note

This article is provided for general education and does not replace individual medical assessment, diagnosis or treatment. Dietary requirements and the need for calcium or vitamin D supplementation vary. Do not start or stop supplements or prescribed osteoporosis medication without advice from an appropriately qualified healthcare professional.

References

1. Iuliano S, Poon S, Robbins J, et al. Effect of dietary sources of calcium and protein on hip fractures and falls in older adults in residential care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;375. https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2364
2. Massé O, Mercurio CM, Dupuis S, et al. Calcium, vitamin D, or combined supplementation to prevent fractures and falls: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2026;393. https://www.bmj.com/content/393/bmj-2025-088050
3. LeBoff MS, Chou SH, Ratliff KA, et al. Supplemental Vitamin D and Incident Fractures in Midlife and Older Adults. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:299–309. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35939577/
4. Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, et al. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(18):1815–1822. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20460620/
5. De Souza MC, Strock NCA, Horgan JM, et al. Prunes preserve hip bone mineral density in a 12-month randomized controlled trial in postmenopausal women: the Prune Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;116(4):897–910. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35798020/
6. Zheng X, Lee SK, Chun OK. Soy food consumption and risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34547749/
7. Montes Chañi EM, Pacheco SOS, Martínez GA, et al. Long-Term Dietary Intake of Chia Seed Is Associated with Increased Bone Mineral Content and Improved Hepatic and Intestinal Morphology in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Nutrients. 2018;10(7):922. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30029467/
8. US National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Calcium: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Calcium-HealthProfessional/
9. US National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Vitamin D: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminD-HealthProfessional/
10. International Osteoporosis Foundation. Epidemiology of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/facts-statistics/epidemiology-of-osteoporosis-and-fragility-fractures
11. Weaver AA, Houston DK, Shapses SA, et al. Effect of Dietary Protein Intake on Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Incidence in Older Adults in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(12):2213–2222. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33677533/
12. Vázquez-Lorente H, García-Gavilán JF, Shyam S, et al. Mediterranean Diet, Physical Activity, and Bone Health in Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(4). https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2832289
13. Sotos-Prieto M, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Fung TT, et al. Plant-Based Diets and Risk of Hip Fracture in Postmenopausal Women. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(2). https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2815636
14. Veronese N, Stubbs B, Solmi M, et al. Dietary magnesium intake and fracture risk: data from a large prospective study. Br J Nutr. 2017;117(11):1570–1576. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28631583/
15. Booth SL, Tucker KL, Chen H, et al. Dietary vitamin K intakes are associated with hip fracture but not with bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(5):1201–1208. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10799384/
16. Booth SL, Dallal G, Shea MK, et al. Effect of vitamin K supplementation on bone loss in elderly men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(4):1217–1223. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18252784/
17. Geraldi MV, Brättemark E, Lorentzon M. Longitudinal associations of dietary intake, physical activity, and short-chain fatty acids with bone development in early postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2026;37:879–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-026-07861-6
18. Claesson MJ, Jeffery IB, Conde S, et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature. 2012;488:178–184. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22797518/
19. Ghosh TS, Rampelli S, Jeffery IB, et al. Mediterranean diet intervention alters the gut microbiome in older people reducing frailty and improving health status: the NU-AGE one-year dietary intervention across five European countries. Gut. 2020;69(7):1218–1228. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32066625/
20. Nilsson AG, Sundh D, Bäckhed F, Lorentzon M. Lactobacillus reuteri reduces bone loss in older women with low bone mineral density: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. J Intern Med. 2018;284(3):307–317. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29926979/